Jehovah and Hades Chapters

Jehovah and Hades Chapters | Chapter 1 | Chapter 2 | The Mormon Theocracy (Free E-Book) |Amazon Download | The Journals of Jacob and Hyde (Free E-Book) |Amazon Download |

Friday, April 11, 2014

"Gospel of Jesus' Wife" Not A Fake: What That Actually Means

Recently, the papyrus named the "Gospel of Jesus' Wife" has been receiving a lot of attention from the mainstream media. It's a papyrus found in Harvard University's collection written in Coptic (ancient Egyptian.) There are eight mostly legible lines on the front and six faded lines on the back. The entire fragment is around the size of a business card.

When experts call it "not a fake," it doesn't mean that Jesus wrote it or that Jesus' wife wrote it. What it means is that it dates back to the time period it claims to be from, which in this case is the sixth to ninth centuries (at minimum) and possibly as far back as the fourth century AD. A lot of church scholars and the Vatican immediately dismissed it as a fake without any analysis because it conflicts with their beliefs.

What the papyrus actually tells us is that ancient Egyptian Christians believed that Jesus could have had a wife. It doesn't offer any strong evidence that he did, it simply gives us a better look at prevailing opinions and attitudes among the Christian community of the time.

There are too many people that are all too willing to cover their ears and yell "I'm not listening" over and over when they hear something that conflicts with their belief or opinion. That's not how you learn and that retards your growth. New evidence is always something that should be considered. Once you look at the new evidence and hear an opinion contrary to your own on the subject, then you have more of a reason to say something like "I don't agree with that" or "I don't believe that." Saying those things without listening to new evidence just because that's not the way you want the world to be makes your opinion easy to disregard because its an uninformed opinion.

Brown University Egyptology professor Leo Depuydt argues that the fragment is a fake. He gives two main reasons:

1. The papyrus makes too many grammatical mistakes that a native Coptic writer wouldn't have made.
2. The papyrus contains "a patchwork of words and phrases from the published and well-known Coptic Gospel of Thomas."

So there is a renowned academic who claims that the fragment is a fake. The difference between his opinion and an uniformed one is that he's an Egyptology professor who examined the papyrus and came to conclusions based on what he saw. He didn't simply say "I'm a really smart guy and I don't like this. It's obviously a fake. Listen to me, I know what I'm talking about." He looked at the new evidence before he formed his opinion (which is based on his observations.)

For a while now I've wanted to find time to read the Gospel of Thomas, just for fun. After this, I might actually go do it. It would be interesting to compare the Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of Jesus' Wife. I just need to find a little extra time. New information is not the devil, even if it contradicts what we currently believe. As a person with a degree in history, I was always taught to keep an open mind because new authentic evidence could appear tomorrow that refutes the prevailing academic theory of the time. If you'd like to read more about what the papyrus actually says, check out the Huffington Post article on the topic, which you can read here.

Saturday, March 29, 2014

Free Books: The Cost Of Doing Business For An Unknown Author

I had a lot of fun gathering all of the book sales numbers for 2012 and 2013. I track them throughout the year when the final numbers become available (so usually monthly.) Lately I've also been curious how many free books I've given away.

When I was a lot younger, I thought it would be the coolest thing ever to publish and sell books. Back in second and third grade I filled an entire notebook with short horror stories roughly based on The Nightmare Before Christmas. Back then, I never thought about money. I just thought it would be cool to have my books out there for other people to read.

Now I'm older and quite a bit more greedy than I was as a third grader. I need this author hobby thing to be making me some money. I still have a desire to have my books out there and being read worldwide but that's taking a backseat to the passive income I hope to generate from ebooks, audio books, and paperbacks. Still, my social media outreach is only so large and to get any kind of sales coming in from people I don't know, it makes sense to turn to free giveaways. Giving away my books for free generally expands my reach to new potential paying customers, gives me a chance to get reviews, and fulfills the wish I've had for a long time to just have my books read.

I decided I wanted to find out exactly how many free books I've given away since 2012. In 2012, I made one of my history articles permanently free in the hope that people would read it and maybe look at my other history articles. It had also been hit by a one star review, so I figured maybe it could get some better reviews if I offered it as a freebie. I added another permafree book, The Journals of Jacob and Hyde, later on and eventually turned The Mormon Theocracy back into a paid article and let another history article have a chance to be the permafreebie for a while.

Here are my free giveaway numbers for 2012:

















So in order to sell the 157 books I sold and expand my reach, I gave away nearly 4,000 ebooks in 2012. That's just via Amazon. I gave away another couple hundred through the other ebook retailers as well. Caribbean Piracy: Pirates and Privateers and Constantine: The Emperor of Tolerance, the ebooks that had the largest giveaways, were also my best sellers for 2012.

Now for 2013:



















In 2013, I sold 372 books. I gave away 8,246 ebooks for free via Amazon plus a few hundred through the other ebook retailers. Over half of them were The Journals of Jacob and Hyde which helps explain why my Jehovah and Hades series is doing a lot better this year.

By January 1, 2014, I had given away 12,245 free ebooks through Amazon worldwide. I doubt I'd be selling hundreds without those free copies. I know authors who pay to be featured in email blasts that give away tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands. It works really well for boosting sales if the first book in a series is free. From The Journals of Jacob and Hyde, I generally see about 2-3% of readers go on and purchase the rest of the series. Fortunately, that makes me more money than when I had The Journals of Jacob and Hyde priced at $1.99. For a series, free downloads of the first book are kind of like a funnel. You want to give away as many as you can if you can maintain a steady percentage of readers who go on and buy the rest of the series.

So for my old third grade wish of just wanting my books to be read, I added in the free numbers from the other outlets. As of January 1, 2014, I had given away 12,838 ebooks worldwide. If you add in my ebook, audio book, and paperback sales for 2012 and 2013 it becomes 13,367. Not bad for an unknown author who hasn't had a chance to use any of the email blast services yet. If I could go back in time and tell myself that I would have 13,000+ books out in the world by the time I'm 28, I'm not sure I would believe myself. :-P

If you have one or a few of those 13,367 books on your phone, tablet, in audio, or in paperback, please consider leaving a review after reading it (especially if you enjoyed it.) I've sold nearly 200 in 2014 so far and I've had to give away a lot less to reach that point because my name is starting to get out there. Reviews help me out a lot.

I guess the last thing I wanted to say is thank you to all of my readers. While I always dreamed about being an author, I thought it would stay a dream. Getting a contract in the traditional publishing world used to be a nightmare. Technology has brought us to a point where an ebook revolution can take place and knock the gatekeepers of books on their asses. I'd also like to thank Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Apple, and all the other companies that give self-published authors like me a chance to compete. As long as the opportunity is available and I can make a little bit of money doing this, I'll keep writing.

Friday, March 14, 2014

Audio Books: What Happens When Amazon Dominates A Market

The audio book market is a relatively small market to dominate. It's nothing compared to the e-book market, paperback market, etc. Recently, it's become pretty clear who dominates when it comes to audio books. Amazon. The largest distributors of audio books are:

Amazon
audible.com
iTunes

 


Amazon created ACX which distributes to all three and gives a cut to the author (and in some cases the narrator if they did a royalty share deal.) The reason they dominate is simple. There is no way to directly distribute audio books to iTunes without going through ACX and Amazon owns audible.com. They pretty much control the entire market.

Up until recently, they had what I would consider pretty fair terms as well. On a royalty share deal (which is what I'll be talking about today since all of my audio book deals are royalty share deals) a narrator agrees to produce an entire audio book for the author and then is entitles to half of their royalties and bonuses for seven years (at which point all of the royalties and bonus payments revert back to the author.) So if I sell an audio book, ACX gets 50% of the price, my narrator gets 25%, and I get 25%. They also had an escalator clause so that with every 500 you sell, you gain an additional percentage point all the way up to 90% (or 45% to the narrator and 45% to the author in a royalty share.)

On top of that, if your book was one of the first three purchased and downloaded by an audible.com new subscriber, they would give you a $25 bonus payment as long as that member stayed a member for at least 60 days. In a royalty share deal, you split the bonus payments with your narrator.

The Changes

Amazon realizes that they completely dominate this market. With that in mind, they sent out an e-mail to all narrators and authors on Feb. 27 explaining that they were changing the terms. All audio books that had been produced or had a contract in place before Mar. 12 would stay under the old terms (with the exception of the bonus payments.) Anything produced after that would be under new drastically reduced percentages:

-In a royalty share deal, author and narrator would split a flat 40% (down from 50%.) There would no longer be an escalator clause to allow them to make their way up to 90% if they sell enough.
-The $25 bonus payment paid when a new audible.com subscriber purchases your book as one of their first three is gone. Now you get a $50 payment if your book is the first audio book purchased by a new audible.com subscriber (which again gets split with the narrator.)

One thing I haven't mentioned is that they set the price. For a while all of my audio books were $6.95 which I thought was ridiculous since they were all under 1 hour of audio. Then they reduced them to $4.95 and finally to $3.95 which seems like a much more reasonable price point. As of Mar 12, I had 9 audio books completed and for sale under the old contract terms and I have contracts in place for another 3 that will be produced under the old contract terms. I doubt I'll make anymore audio books any time soon because I don't think I can get the same narrators or even good narrators to agree to royalty share deals anymore.

Possible Causes For The Changes

So under the new contract terms, ACX wants to take 60% for distributing a product that was created by others. They didn't help narrate and they didn't help write the book. They also retain full control over the price. I've been thinking about why they're doing this because this seems very against what Amazon is usually about. A few things come to mind:

-Amazon and audible.com have been paying a ton of money to make audio books a big thing. I see their ads on buses, billboards, and all over Facebook and Google. They're definitely trying to get people excited about audio books.
-For audio books that they think will be successful, they've been paying the narrators an additional $100 per finished production hour on royalty share deals. That's definitely a good incentive to take on a project from a narrator's standpoint, you get a decent cash payment up front and then royalties for seven years.

So maybe they're digging themselves out of the hole they dug themselves in to. I know a lot of Amazon companies that operate at a loss for a long time but they all have to eventually turn a profit, even if the margins are very thin. Another thing to consider is the fact that audio books are large files and paying for the bandwidth to transfer these files is a fairly substantial cost. They don't pass that cost on to the narrators and the authors.

As of Mar. 12, I've sold 187 audio books. I haven't had to do much to sell them. I do believe audible.com is responsible for a lot of my sales and the rest come from people stumbling into them on iTunes (which again would be a market unavailable to me without ACX.) Last year audio books were responsible for slightly over half my royalties as an author (they definitely won't be this year but they're still a substantial part of my author earnings.) I made two of the bonus payments last year which gave me $12.50 each time for a total of $25.00.

In The End

I understand some of the reasons why they need to make a change like this and start making some money. What I don't quite understand is why it had to be so drastic right now. They could have eliminated the escalator clause and changed the bonus payments but let the author and narrator split a flat 60% of the royalties. They could have gone to a flat 50% and given authors control of the pricing. There's a lot of things they could have done to cause less of an outcry when they did this. They didn't really care.


 


They're receiving petitions, hate mail, negative comments on their blog, and they're seeing lots of authors and narrators walk away. They aren't responding. I think their silence is basically their way of saying "we don't care. Try to find someone else to distribute your audio books if you can." Oh and the rates I quoted above are if you are an exclusive distributor through ACX meaning your audio books aren't anywhere else. If you choose to be non-exclusive, you make even smaller percentages.

I don't care all that much. By the end of the year, I should have 12 audio books under their old contract terms. I've already been selling audio books for over a year. I'm glad I jumped on this when I did because anyone who put it off is about to get screwed out of an emerging market or forced to accept very crappy terms. I just see this as a very interesting way to analyze what Amazon does when they control a market. They could even do this without much of an outcry from anyone other than authors and narrators because pretty much no one outside of those two groups knows that Amazon owns audible.com and is the sole distributor of audio books to iTunes.

They also just raised the cost of Amazon Prime membership by $20 a year. Are they making small steps towards becoming a company that actually cares about margin? Have the shareholders finally had their voice heard by the behemoth? Or are we seeing the same Amazon that is just trying to grab some cash to fund the takeover of new markets?